A weblog of periodic insights from a former know-it-all Infantry Officer


Posted by Schmedlap at: 3:34 PM on 08 FEB 10 | Comments (0) | Reply to this post

As a former OPSEC freak, I must confess a recent transgression. In a breach of etiquette on par with that of Scooter Libby, I recklessly outed Kenneth Payne when I pondered, by way of a typed statement on a publicly-accessible webpage, about his alter ego. Apologies.

Yeah, blogging has been pretty light. But, if you’ve got nothing to say, be brief.

Posted by Schmedlap at: 3:34 PM on 08 FEB 10 | Permalink | Comments (0) | Reply to this post

bayonet


Posted by Schmedlap at: 3:40 PM on 05 FEB 10 | Comments (4) | Reply to this post

Feel free to include this graphic in any presentations or papers that you draft/present/author.

They don't even look alike

Posted by Schmedlap at: 3:40 PM on 05 FEB 10 | Permalink | Comments (4) | Reply to this post

bayonet


Somebody needs to order a larger plate because ours is already full
Posted by Schmedlap at: 7:51 PM on 02 FEB 10 | Comments (10) | Reply to this post

Let's see, we've got a war going on in Iraq, another in Afghanistan, troops across the border from an unpredictable authoritarian regime in Korea, and a bunch of other fairly significant issues in the national security arena. So what should we do? Shift troops? Alter objectives? Change our procurement priorities? Manipulate deployment timelines? Nah. Let's open a new can of worms and push for repeal of DADT. That makes sense.

Posted by Schmedlap at: 7:51 PM on 02 FEB 10 | Permalink | Comments (10) | Reply to this post

bayonet


Posted by Schmedlap at: 2:59 PM on 02 FEB 10 | Comments (5) | Reply to this post

What would happen if we just packed up and left Afghanistan?

Posted by Schmedlap at: 2:59 PM on 02 FEB 10 | Permalink | Comments (5) | Reply to this post

bayonet


Is it not the tribes, or am I stupid?
Posted by Schmedlap at: 6:55 PM on 27 JAN 10 | Comments (6) | Reply to this post

Yesterday, upon discovering the carcass of Ghosts of Alexander I re-read a couple of Christian's older posts, including Petraeus and McChrystal Drink Major Gant's Snake Oil and Gravediggers Disinter Tribal Militia Corpse. In doing so, I came across something that I had overlooked before. In his rebuttal of Jim Gant's paper on tribes, Christian posted this piece from the Human Terrain System, published in September 2009:

My Cousin’s Enemy is My Friend: A Study of Pashtun “Tribes”

I read through this and found it to be a good explanation for why tribes may not be a good conduit for us to work through and why it might not be productive to empower them as a means to our objectives. That is, I found it to be a good explanation if the observations are valid and the reasoning is sound. It made sense to me, but I am not an anthropologist and I have never been to Afghanistan.

I posted this question at SWJ, but did not get much of a response. So, I am reposting here to target the slightly different readership that visits here. My question is this:

Is anyone aware of any informed critiques of this paper - positive or negative? Or, for those with relevant knowledge/experience, what are your thoughts on the paper?

Comments, thoughts, links to other comments or thoughts, or any other input would be appreciated.

Posted by Schmedlap at: 6:55 PM on 27 JAN 10 | Permalink | Comments (6) | Reply to this post

bayonet


The good die young
Posted by Schmedlap at: 4:50 PM on 26 JAN 10 | Comments (0) | Reply to this post

One of my favorite blogs, Ghosts of Alexander is, according to its author, "dead." The good news is that he will now be posting at Registan.

Hopefully he reconsiders. Count me among the individuals demanding that this dead patient be kept on the respirator.

Posted by Schmedlap at: 4:50 PM on 26 JAN 10 | Permalink | Comments (0) | Reply to this post

bayonet


By God's grace alone, some people have not been struck down for gross stupidity
Posted by Schmedlap at: 04:43 AM on 21 JAN 10 | Comments (3) | Reply to this post

Being stupid might not be a sin, but that does not make it a virtue by default.

As a Christian, there are few things that frustrate me more than the actions of fellow Christians. I recently heard a pastor say something along the lines of, "conduct yourself in a manner that will contradict the prejudices of non-believers." Essentially, he was acknowledging that we have a poor reputation that has been hard-earned by many who like to use the Bible as a bludgeon against others, rather than a source of knowledge as a guide toward a better relationship with Christ. He was pleading, in very diplomatic terms, for people to stop repelling people with stupidity. Prejudice toward Christians is not problematic because of what others think of us; only God's judgment matters. The prejudice is problematic because it deters those people from ever opening their hearts and minds (COIN reference!) to Jesus. Much of the disdain for Christians is borne of irritation at obnoxious behavior that is justified with self-righteousness. People behave rudely and stupidly and then, out of pride, defend their behavior by an appeal to authority and attack others by asserting others' failures to abide by God's law. Pot, meet kettle.

The recent revelation (I couldn't resist) that Trijicon prints shorthand notation for biblical references on their optic sights has caused a bit of a stir because it can feed the suspicion in the Mideast that our Soldiers are Crusaders (see also comments here and here). This, in turn, can undermine the mission that our military was sent to accomplish. This seems pretty straightforward to me…
Hebrews 13:17 (NIV)
Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you.

Romans 13:1-2 (NIV)
Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.
Now, some will ignore this and justify their actions by asserting that they need to raise up the Lord's name at every opportunity and to do the opposite is a sin. Well, no, it's not. It is a sin to deny the Lord. Not spending your every waking moment proselytizing is not a sin. Proselytizing in a manner that directly disobeys and undermines the just and lawful orders of those appointed over you is a sin. When we were invading Iraq, should we have been blasting praise music from speakers, rather than 25mm from our Bushmasters? Should we have been dropping Bibles instead of artillery? Of course not. That would have been stupid because it was not faithful to the mission that we were ordered to execute. Likewise, a manufacturer of optics used almost exclusively in missions in predominantly Muslim locations, where there is suspicion of our motives, should not be "spreading the word" in a way that undermines the mission. In fact, when the manner in which you choose to "spread the word" simply hardens peoples' hearts against hearing your message, then you are achieving through incompetence and recklessness the same effect of denying the Lord.

I can already anticipate the assertions that some will make that blasting praise music and dropping Bibles would have worked great because anything is possible with God. I agree that anything is possible with God. But just because something is possible, that does not make it His will.

It bears repeating. You cannot single-handedly accomplish the mission. But you sure can screw it up.

Posted by Schmedlap at: 04:43 AM on 21 JAN 10 | Permalink | Comments (3) | Reply to this post

bayonet